A Comprehensive Computed Tomographic Anatomy of the Mediastinal Cavity in Jebeer (Gazella bennettii)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Jebeer (Gazella bennettii) primarily inhabits the central and southeastern regions of Iran. The estimated population in this country is only around 1,300 individuals, underscoring the need for increased conservation efforts and research. Due to the lack of anatomical data for this species and to address urgent conservation needs, such as veterinary care, this study aimed to provide detailed anatomical insights into the mediastinal cavity of the Jebeer using non-invasive computed tomography (CT). Four healthy adult Jebeer -both males and females- aged 2.5-3.5 years and weighing 20–25 kg and were anesthetized and positioned in sternal recumbency. CT images of the thoracic region were acquired perpendicular to the thoracic vertebrae, with a slice thickness of 3 mm. Thoracic vertebrae served as anatomical landmarks to describe the position and extent of mediastinal organs. Structures were compared to those of dissected goats for reference. Key structures such as the trachea, cranial vena cava, and aorta in Jebeer exhibited similarities to the corresponding landmarks in goats. The trachea bifurcated at the level of the 6th thoracic vertebra, while the cranial vena cava entered the right atrium at the 4th thoracic vertebra. The aortic arch and pulmonary trunk were observed at the 4th-5th and 6th thoracic vertebrae, respectively. No anatomical differences were observed between males and females in the mediastinal structures. Species-specific variations in the positioning of pulmonary vessels and other structures were identified when compared to other ruminants and carnivores. Additionally, the angle and position of the heart in the Jebeer were distinct from those in carnivores, resulting in differences in the attachment sites of the major blood vessels. This research provides a comprehensive CT-based anatomical atlas of the mediastinal cavity in the Jebeer, offering valuable insights for veterinary diagnostics and treatment of mediastinal conditions. These findings can also support targeted conservation strategies for this endangered species.­

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Iran R. The Chinkara (Gazella bennettii) in Iran, with the description of two new subspecies. J Sci. 1993; 4(3).
  2. Ziaie H. A field guide to the mammals of Iran. Tehran: Department of the Environment; 1996.
  3. Fadakar D, Malekian M, Hemami MR, Rezaei HR, Lerp H, Bärmann EV. Phylogenetic Assessment of Gazella bennettii: A Genetic Framework for the Conservation of the Endangered Jebeer in Iran. Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70954
  4. Mallon D, Kingswood S. Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Global Survey and Regional Action Plans. SSC Antelope Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, England. 2001.
  5. Rahmani R, Izadi M, Khaledi B. Study on reproduction of Jebeer Gazelle (Gazelle dorcas) in Shir-Ahmad wildlife sancturary. 2004.
  6. Sajjadian SM, Shojaei B, Molaei MM. Computed tomographic anatomy of the bronchial tree of the Jebeer Gazelle. Iranian J Vet Surg. 2008; (1):73-80. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20083033.2008.03.1.8.9
  7. Shojaei B, Sajjadian S. Computed tomographic anatomy of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses of the jebeer. Iranian J Vet Surg. 2008; 3(4):75-84.
  8. Diana A, Pivetta M, Cipone M. Imaging evaluation of the small animal mediastinum. Vet Res Commun. 2006; 30:145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-0028-6
  9. Prather AB, Berry CR, Thrall DE. Use of radiography in combination with computed tomography for the assessment of noncardiac thoracic disease in the dog and cat. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2005; 46(2):114-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00023.x
  10. Greco A, Meomartino L, Gnudi G, Brunetti A, Di Giancamillo M. Imaging techniques in veterinary medicine. Part II: Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine. Eur J Radiol Open. 2023; 10:100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100467   
  11. Yoon J, Feeney DA, Cronk DE, Anderson KL, Ziegler LE. Computed tomographic evaluation of canine and feline mediastinal masses in 14 patients. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004; 45(6):542-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04093.x
  12. De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, Simoens PJ, van Bree H. Computed tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the thorax in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2005; 66(3):512-24. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.512
  13. Hahn KA, Lantz GC, Salisbury SK, Blevins WE, Widmer WR. Comparison of survey radiography with ultrasonography and x-ray computed tomography for clinical staging of subcutaneous neoplasms in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990; 196(11):1795-8.
  14. Olby NJ, Müntana KR, Sharp NJ, Thrall DE. The computed tomographic appearance of acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2000;41(5):396-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01860.x
  15. Patsikas MN, Rallis T, Kladakis SE, Dessiris AK. Computed tomography diagnosis of isolated splenic torsion in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2001; 42(3):235-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2001.tb00931.x
  16. Henninger W. Use of computed tomography in the diseased feline thorax. J Small Anim Pract. 2003; 44(2):56-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2003.tb00121.x
  17. Takahashi A, Yamada K, Kishimoto M, Shimizu J, Maeda R. Computed tomography (CT) observation of pulmonary emboli caused by long-term administration of ivermectin in dogs experimentally infected with heartworms. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 155(3-4):242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.027
  18. Epperly E, Whitty JA. Equine imaging: computed tomography interpretation. Vet Clin Equine Pract. 2020; 36(3):527-43.
  19. Pringle JK, Wojcinski ZW, Staempfli HR. Nasal papillary adenoma in a goat. Can Vet J. 1989; 30(12):964. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17423479/
  20. Gerros TC, Mattoon JS, Snyder SP. Use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of a cerebral abscess in a goat. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1998; 39(4):322-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1998.tb01614.x
  21. Di Giancamillo M, Lombardo R, Beretta S, Pravettoni D, Cipone M, Scanziani E, et al. Congenital facial infiltrative lipoma in a calf. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2002; 43(1):46-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2002.tb00442.x
  22. Alston C, Mengersen K, Gardner G. A new method for calculating the volume of primary tissue types in live sheep using computed tomography scanning. Anim Prod Sci. 2009; 49(11):1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09038
  23. Barnes H, Tucker RL, Grant BD, Roberts GD, Prades M. Lag screw stabilization of a cervical vertebral fracture by use of computed tomography in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995; 206(2):221-3.
  24. Martens P, Ihler CF, Rennesund J. Detection of a radiographically occult fracture of the lateral palmar process of the distal phalanx in a horse using computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1999; 40(4):346-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999.tb02122.x
  25. Regodon S, Franco A, Garin J, Robina A, Lignereux Y. Computerized tomographic determination of the cranial volume of the dog applied to racial and sexual differentiation. Cells Tissues Organs. 1991; 142(4):347-50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000147214
  26. Robina A, Regodón S, Guillen M, Lignereux Y. Utilization of computerized tomography for the determination of the volume of the cranial cavity of the Galgo Hound. Cells Tissues Organs. 1991; 140(2):108-11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000147044
  27. Arencibia A, Vazquez J, Ramirez J, Sandoval J, Ramirez G, Sosa C. Anatomy of the cranioencephalic structures of the goat (Capra hircus L.) by imaging techniques: a computerized tomographic study. Anat Histol Embryol. 1997; 26(3):161-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.1997.tb00119.x
  28. Walker NE, Olszewski ME, Wahle A, Nixon E, Sieren JP, Yang F, et al., editors. Measurement of coronary vasoreactivity in sheep using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and 3-D segmentation. International Congress Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.03.189
  29. Shojaei B, Nazem MN, Vosough D. Anatomic reference for computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses and their openings in the Rayini goat. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 2008; 3(2):77-85.
  30. Onar V, Kahvecioglu K, Çebi V. Computed tomographic analysis of the cranial cavity and neurocranium in the German shepherd dog (Alsatian) puppies. Vet Arh. 2002; 72(2):57-66.
  31. Cardoso L, Gil F, Ramírez G, Teixeira M, Agut A, Rivero M, et al. Computed tomography (CT) of the lungs of the dog using a helical CT scanner, intravenous iodine contrast medium and different CT windows. Anat Histol Embryol. 2007; 36(5):328-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2007.00776.x
  32. Smallwood JE, George TF. Anatomic atlas for computed tomography in the mesaticephalic dog: thorax and cranial abdomen. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1993; 34(2):65-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1993.tb01510.x
  33. Shojaei B, Vajhi A, Rostami A, Molaei M, Arashian I, Hashemnia S. Computed tomographic anatomy of the abdominal region of cat. Iran J Vet Res. 2006; 7(2):45-52.
  34. Shojaei B, Rostami A, Vajhi A, Shafaee M. Computed tomographic anatomy of the thoracic region of the cat. Vet Arh. 2003; 73(5):261-70.
  35. Vladova D, Stefanov M, Toneva Y. Computed tomography study of thoracic aorta in the cat. Bulg J Vet Med. 2005; 8(3):151–6.
  36. Vladova DI, Toneva YG, Stefanov M. Computed tomography (CT) of the cranial mediastinum in the cat (Felis silvestris f. domestica). Trakia J Sci. 2005; 3(1):53-7.
  37. Samii VF, Biller DS, Koblik PD. Normal cross‐sectional anatomy of the feline thorax and abdomen: comparison of computed tomography and cadaver anatomy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1998; 39(6):504-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1998.tb01640.x
  38. Braun U, Irmer M, Augsburger H, Jud R, Ohlerth S. Computed tomography of the abdomen in Saanen goats: I. Reticulum, rumen and omasum. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2011; 153(7):307-13. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-49065
  39. Ohlerth S, Becker-Birck M, Augsburger H, Jud R, Makara M, Braun U. Computed tomography measurements of thoracic structures in 26 clinically normal goats. Res Vet Sci. 2012; 92(1):7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.10.019
  40. Alsafy M. Computed tomography and cross-sectional anatomy of the thorax of goat. Small Rumin Res. 2008; 79(2-3):158-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.028
  41. Sajjadian SM, Shojaei B, Sohrab Zade B. Computed Tomographic Anatomy of the Abdominal Cavity in the Jebeer (Gazella bennettii). Anat Sci J. 2015; 12(1):37-44.
  42. Shojaei B, Vosough D, Sharifi F. Computed tomographic anatomy of the thoracic cavity vessels in the rayini goat. Iran J Vet Surg. 2012; 7(1-2):9-22. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20083033.2012.07.1.1.0
  43. Sisson S. The anatomy of the domestic animals. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1975.
  44. Done SH, Ashdown RR. Color atlas of veterinary anatomy. Elsevier; 2011.